\n
×
\n
\n
\n
\n
\nEinstein's Special Relativity Explained Simply - no mathThis entire revolution in physics started with a simple thought experiments, in the prolific imagination before Einstein even graduated from high school. Einstein’s theory of...\nEinstein's Special Relativity Explained Simply - no math
This entire revolution in physics started with a simple thought experiments, in the prolific imagination before Einstein even graduated from high school. Einstein’s theory of special relativity is convention today. But to understand how revolutionary it was for its time, it is helpful to look at what the conventional understanding of physics was during the time of Einstein’s teenage years.
In 1801, Thomas Young had conducted a simple double slit experiment that showed that light behaved like a wave. So the theory about light at the time was that it was a wave. The problem is that a wave, it was thought, had to move through some sort of medium. They called this substance the luminiferous aether.
But in 1887, two scientists by the name of Albert Michelson and Edward Morely came up with an idea to test the existence of the aether. The background ether was believed to be unmoving and static, so if the wave was traveling in the same direction as the earth, the speed of the wave should be higher in the direction of the speed of the earth. Michelson and Morley showed that there was no difference in the speed of light of the two measurements. This seriously jeopardized the aether theory.
Einstein knew this, so he came up with a thought experiment as a 16 year old. His thought was to imagine that he was chasing a beam of light while traveling at the speed of light himself. What would he see? If young Albert could catch up to the beam, he should see a stationary wave.
Yet that was impossible. Einstein knew such stationary fields would violate the equations of electromagnetism developed by James Clerk Maxwell 20 years earlier.
So he came up with two postulates, and tried to figure out what the physics would be if the two postulates were true.
Postulate 1 was that the laws of physics are the same for all inertial reference frames.
Postulate 2 was that the speed of light in a vacuum is constant for all inertial reference frames.
The first postulate had been assumed for hundreds of years. The second postulate, however, was the revolution.
This meant that young Einstein would never see the stationary, oscillating fields, because he could never catch the light beam.
But this solution seemed to have fatal flaw. Einstein later explained the problem with another thought experiment:
Imagine firing a light beam along a railroad embankment just as a train roars by in the same direction at, say, 2,000 miles a second. Someone standing on the embankment would measure the light beam’s speed to be the standard number, 186,000 miles a second. But someone on the train would see it moving past at only 184,000 miles a second.
If the speed of light was not constant, Maxwell’s equations would somehow have to look different inside the railcar, and the first postulate would be violated. The solution to his thought experiment was that observers in relative motion experience time differently. This completely overturned hundreds of years of classical physics in which time was absolute in the universe. Einstein showed that time is relative, and varies in different frames of reference. The idea of the aether was no longer needed.
This one realization that reality is not the same for different frames of reference also led to other implications of special relativity:
That Fast moving object appear shorter
That Fast moving objects appears to have increased mass
And finally, the most famous equation in science E=MC2
That mass and energy are equivalent.
So, how did Einstein come up with his most famous equation based on his original two postulates? Let’s look at this conceptually.
If conservation of mass is interpreted as conservation of rest mass, this did not hold true in special relativity. Since different observers would disagree about what the energy of a system was, the mass and energy taken together must be conserved, not just the mass on its own.
It turns out that for the laws of physics, namely conservation of energy and momentum, to be consistent in the two \"reference frames\" of two observers moving with respect to each other, there has to be an energy associated with a body at rest, not just a body in motion. And that is what E=MC2 implies – the M in the equation is the mass at rest.
Some people point out that much of the actual work for special relativity had already been done by the time Einstein presented it. The concepts of time dilation for moving objects, were already in place and the mathematics had already been developed by Lorentz & Poincare. Einstein still deserves the accolades because he rejected the idea of the ether all together which other scientists had not done, and the idea of mass and energy equivalence via E=MC2 is solely Einstein. Scientists who had done prior work like Thomson, Larmor, Lorentz, or Poincare had never implied such a bold proposition. \n
\n
\n
\n
Resource Details
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n- Educator Rating
Not yet Rated
\n
\n
\n
\n- Media Length
\n- 11:48
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n- Grade
- 12th - Higher Ed
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n- Source:
\n\nArvin Ash\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n\n- Language
- English
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n- Usage Permissions
- Fine Print: Educational Use
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Additional Materials
\n
\" data-title=\"Get Full Access\" data-container=\"body\" rel=\"popover\" tabindex=\"0\" href=\"/subscription/new\">Video Transcript\n
\n
\" data-title=\"Get Full Access\" data-container=\"body\" rel=\"popover\" tabindex=\"0\" href=\"/subscription/new\">Video Preview\n
![\"Special](\"https://static.lp.lexp.cloud/images/attachment_defaults/resource/large/missing.png\" "\\"Special")
\n