As part of a study of immigration law, class members read a summary of the Supreme Court case, Arizona v. United States. They then examine a series of examples and acting as federal court judges, must determine if the scenarios meet the requirements of reasonable suspicion as defined by the case.
- Have class members track recent immigration debate and legal proceedings
- The activity assumes that a protocol is in pace for the safe, respectful discussion of controversial issues
- 10th in an 11-part series of resources, designed to be used in order
- The nine-page packet includes a detailed plan, a summary of the Supreme Court case, five scenarios, an answer key, and links to related lessons